ADVANTAGES AND CONTROVERSY OF COMMON AGRICULTURAL AND COHESION POLICY IN THE EU
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1604365KKeywords:
agriculture, European Union, policy, prices, directives.Abstract
The authors explore deals and payments that have a positive effect on the development of Common agricultural and cohesion policy. They particularly emphasize the ways of protecting the European Union from cheap imported products from non-EU countries. They also deal with the mechanisms that are built into the process, with the structural policy regarding "Agenda 2000", as well as the reforms of Common agricultural and cohesion policy from its beginnings until now. The paper presents problems of guaranteed prices, ecology, quotas, agricultural levies and customs duties. The authors also investigated the Common Agricultural and Rural Policy of the European Union 2014-2020, the ways to accelerate the transfer of technology and strengthen the cooperation between agriculture and research sectors in the future.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. Cvetanović, S., Jovanović, M. (2014): Mesto obnovljivih resursa i unapredjenje energetske efkasnosti u energetskoj politici Evropske, Ekonomika, Društvo ekonomista "Ekonomika", vol. 60 no. 1. pp. 41-50, Niš.
2. Cvijanović, D., Simonović, Z., Mihailović, B. (2011): Tržišta i ciljevi najnovijih reformi agrarne i regionalne politike Evropske unije, Ekonomika poljoprivrede, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 359-371, Beograd.
3. Dinan, D. (2009): Sve bliža Unija – uvod u evropsku integraciju, Službeni glasnik, Beograd.
4. European Commission (1997): Agenda 2000 – For a stronger and wider Union, Bulletin of the European Union 5/1997 available at http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/cap-history/agenda-2000/com97-2000_en.pdf
5. European Commission (2004): A New Partnership for Cohesion: Convergence, Competitiveness, Cooperation, Offce for Offcial Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
6. European Commission (2007): Preparing for the "Health Check" of the CAP reform, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, Document COM (2007) 722 fnal, November 20, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/healthcheck/com2007_722_en.pdf
7. European Commission (2013): Overwiev of CAP Reform 2014-2020, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/policy-perspectives/policy-briefs/05_en.pdf
8. European Council (1997): Conclusions of the Presidency , Bulletin EC 12-1997, available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/lux1_en.htm#up
9. Grant, W. (1997): The Common Agricultural Policy, Macmillan, Basingstoke and London.
10.Janković, S. (2009): Evropska unija i ruralni razvoj Srbije, Institut za primenu nauke u poljoprivredi, Beograd.
11.Jurkenaite, N. (2012): Reform of the EU United Agrarian Policy after 2012, Economics of Agricultural and Processing Enterprises, no. 3, pp. 26-30.
12.Kostić, A., Kostić, V. (2014): Svetska ekonomska kriza i zemlje u razvoju, Ekonomika, Društvo ekonomista "Ekonomika", vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 125-137, Niš.
13.Kostić, A., Simonović, Z., Momirović, D. (2015): The Processes of Globalization and Modern Agriculture-Sociological Aspects, Economic Insights – Trends and Challenges, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 23-30, Bucharest.
14.Lejman, K., Krebs, A. (2003): Kontrola nad zalihama hrane In: Džeri Mander i Edvard Goldsmit, Globalizacija, CLIO, Beograd; Besjeda, Banja Luka, pp. 145-156.
15. Lewis, D. P. (1993): The Road to Europe: History, instituons and Prospects of European integration 1945-1993, Peter Lang, New York.
16. McCormic, J. (2010): Razumjeti Europsku uniju, MATE doo, Zagreb.
17. Medović, V. (2011): Sporazum o stabilizaciji i pridruživanju – sa praksom suda EU, Službeni glasnik, Beograd.
18. Vasiljević, Z., Subić, J. (2008): Značaj bottom-up pristupa u planiranju i realizaciji lokalnih i regionalnih programa ruralnog i poljoprivrednog razvoja u Srbiji, Tematski zbornik: Agrarna i ruralna politika u Srbiji 2 – Početna iskustva pridruživanja EU I predlog mera za 2009. godinu, DAES, pp. 57-67, Beograd.
19.Vidović, B. (2010): Zajednička poljoprivredna politika, Evropska unija, МАТЕ, Zagreb.
20.Zakarija, F. (2004): Budućnost slobode, Neoliberalna demokratija kod kuce i u svetu, DAN GRAF, Beograd.
21.Тrozbi, D. (2012): Ekonomika kulturne politike, CLIO, Beograd.
22.Фрумкин, Б. (2012): Общая сельскохозяйственная и рыболовная политика, Европейский Союз: факты и комментарии, Ассоциация европейских исследований, выпуск 66, pp. 15-20, Москва, available at: http://www.edc-aes.ru/data/edcaes/content/user_fles/images/66.pdf
2. Cvijanović, D., Simonović, Z., Mihailović, B. (2011): Tržišta i ciljevi najnovijih reformi agrarne i regionalne politike Evropske unije, Ekonomika poljoprivrede, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 359-371, Beograd.
3. Dinan, D. (2009): Sve bliža Unija – uvod u evropsku integraciju, Službeni glasnik, Beograd.
4. European Commission (1997): Agenda 2000 – For a stronger and wider Union, Bulletin of the European Union 5/1997 available at http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/cap-history/agenda-2000/com97-2000_en.pdf
5. European Commission (2004): A New Partnership for Cohesion: Convergence, Competitiveness, Cooperation, Offce for Offcial Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
6. European Commission (2007): Preparing for the "Health Check" of the CAP reform, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, Document COM (2007) 722 fnal, November 20, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/healthcheck/com2007_722_en.pdf
7. European Commission (2013): Overwiev of CAP Reform 2014-2020, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/policy-perspectives/policy-briefs/05_en.pdf
8. European Council (1997): Conclusions of the Presidency , Bulletin EC 12-1997, available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/lux1_en.htm#up
9. Grant, W. (1997): The Common Agricultural Policy, Macmillan, Basingstoke and London.
10.Janković, S. (2009): Evropska unija i ruralni razvoj Srbije, Institut za primenu nauke u poljoprivredi, Beograd.
11.Jurkenaite, N. (2012): Reform of the EU United Agrarian Policy after 2012, Economics of Agricultural and Processing Enterprises, no. 3, pp. 26-30.
12.Kostić, A., Kostić, V. (2014): Svetska ekonomska kriza i zemlje u razvoju, Ekonomika, Društvo ekonomista "Ekonomika", vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 125-137, Niš.
13.Kostić, A., Simonović, Z., Momirović, D. (2015): The Processes of Globalization and Modern Agriculture-Sociological Aspects, Economic Insights – Trends and Challenges, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 23-30, Bucharest.
14.Lejman, K., Krebs, A. (2003): Kontrola nad zalihama hrane In: Džeri Mander i Edvard Goldsmit, Globalizacija, CLIO, Beograd; Besjeda, Banja Luka, pp. 145-156.
15. Lewis, D. P. (1993): The Road to Europe: History, instituons and Prospects of European integration 1945-1993, Peter Lang, New York.
16. McCormic, J. (2010): Razumjeti Europsku uniju, MATE doo, Zagreb.
17. Medović, V. (2011): Sporazum o stabilizaciji i pridruživanju – sa praksom suda EU, Službeni glasnik, Beograd.
18. Vasiljević, Z., Subić, J. (2008): Značaj bottom-up pristupa u planiranju i realizaciji lokalnih i regionalnih programa ruralnog i poljoprivrednog razvoja u Srbiji, Tematski zbornik: Agrarna i ruralna politika u Srbiji 2 – Početna iskustva pridruživanja EU I predlog mera za 2009. godinu, DAES, pp. 57-67, Beograd.
19.Vidović, B. (2010): Zajednička poljoprivredna politika, Evropska unija, МАТЕ, Zagreb.
20.Zakarija, F. (2004): Budućnost slobode, Neoliberalna demokratija kod kuce i u svetu, DAN GRAF, Beograd.
21.Тrozbi, D. (2012): Ekonomika kulturne politike, CLIO, Beograd.
22.Фрумкин, Б. (2012): Общая сельскохозяйственная и рыболовная политика, Европейский Союз: факты и комментарии, Ассоциация европейских исследований, выпуск 66, pp. 15-20, Москва, available at: http://www.edc-aes.ru/data/edcaes/content/user_fles/images/66.pdf
Downloads
Published
2016-12-31
How to Cite
Kostić, V., Simonović, Z., & Kostić, A. (2016). ADVANTAGES AND CONTROVERSY OF COMMON AGRICULTURAL AND COHESION POLICY IN THE EU. Economics of Agriculture, 63(4), 1365–1378. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1604365K
Issue
Section
Review articles
