EFFICIENCY OF EU FINANCIAL SUPPORT POLICY FOR DEVELOPMENT OF RURAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN POLAND

Authors

  • Adam Wasilewski, PhD Institute of Agriculture and Food Economics – National Research Institute, Warsaw

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1502437W

Keywords:

EU policy, public support, effciency of allocation, SME development, rural areas.

Abstract

The main research objective was to assess the effciency and effectiveness, in some theoretical approaches considered as a type of effciency, of EU fnancial support affecting the entrepreneurship development in rural areas of Poland. Descriptive and comparative analysis of basic statistics and Gini coeffcient as well as the econometric model of absolute beta convergence were applied as e research methods. The analysis utilised the data from Central Statistical Offce, Local Data Bank, for 2004-2013 for 1,529 rural counties. General conclusion of the paper is that EU fnancial support had a positive and statistically signifcant impact on local absolute beta convergence. Moreover, the analyses confrmed that the higher level of support from the EU budget accelerates an increase in the number of private enterprises, micro-enterprises and the number of the employees. It also slows down the processes of growth in the number of the unemployed. However this is the shorttime effect.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Abreu, M., de Groot, H., Florax, M. (2005): A Meta-Analysis of β-Convergence: the Legendary 2%, Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 389- 420.
2. Bal Domanska, B. (2011): Ekonometryczna identyfkacja β konwergencji regionow szczebla NUTS-2 państw Unii Europejskiej, Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Oeconomica, no. 253, pp. 9, University of Lodz, Lodz.
3. Coase, R. (1960): The problem of social cost, Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-44.
4. Gancarczyk, M. (2010): Wsparcie publiczne dla MSP, Podstawy teoretyczne a praktyka gospodarcza, C. H. Beck, Warszawa.
5. Krol, M. (2000): Kierunki oddziaływania uwarunkowan na cele i srodki polityki zatrudnienia, Polityka Gospodarcza, no. 3, pp. 43-50.
6. Landreth, H., Colander, D. (2005): Historia Mysli Ekonomicznej, PWN, Warszawa, pp. 58-63.
7. Lau, L., Quian, Y., Roland, G. (2000): Reform Without Losers: An Interpretation of Chinas Dual-Track Approach to Transition, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 120-143.
8. Lazniewska, E., Gorecki, T., Chmielewski, R. (2011): Konwergencja regionalna, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu, Poznan.
9. Local Data Bank of the Central Statistical Offce, Central Statistical Offce of Poland, Warsaw, information portal, available at: www.stat.gov.pl
10.Monfort, P. (2008): Convergence of EU regions Measures and Evolution, Working papers 1/2018, A series of short papers on regional research and indicators produced by the Directorate-General for Regional Policy, European Commission, Brussels, pp. 1-20.
11.Murrell, P. (2005): Institutions and Firms in Transition Economies, in: Menard, C., Shirley, M. (Edts.) Handbook of New Institutional Economics, Springer, Dordrecht, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp. 688-690.
12.North, D. (2005): Institutions and the performance of economies over time, in: Menard, C., Shirley, M. (Edts.) Handbook of New Institutional Economics, Springer, Dordrecht, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp. 22-23.
13.Pawłowski, G. (2000): Wykorzystanie analizy efektywności funkcjonowania instytucji publicznych w aspekcie konkurencyjności regionów, Polityka Gospodarcza, no. 3, pp. 65-71.
14.Quah, D. (1996): Twin Peaks: Growth and Convergence in Models of Distribution Dynamics, Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 106, no. 437, pp. 1045-55.
15.Romer, P. (1994):The Origins of Endogenous Growth, Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 3-22.
16.Solow, R. (1956): A contribution to the theory of economic growth, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 65-94.
17.Steger, T. (2006): On the Mechanics of Economic Convergence, German Economic Review, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 317–337.
18.Stiglitz, J. E. (2004): Ekonomia sektora publicznego, PWN, Warszawa.
19.Stringham, E. (2001): Kaldor-Hicks Effciency and the Problem of Central Planning, the Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 42.
20.Wasilewski, A. (Ed.), (2011):Instrumenty polityki regionalnej i strukturalnej wspierajace rozwoj przedsiebiorczosci na obszarach wiejskich, Prace Programu Wieloletniego, no. 14, IAFE-NRI, Warszawa.
21.Wasilewski, A. (Ed.), (2013):Skuteczność instrumentów polityki regionalnej i strukturalnej oddziałujących na rozwój przedsiębiorczości, Prace Programu Wieloletniego, no. 77, IAFE-NRI, Warszawa, pp. 46-47.
22.Weingast, B. (2005): The performance and stability of federalism: an institutional perspective, in: Menard, C., Shirley, M. (Edts.) Handbook of New Institutional Economics, Springer, Dordrecht, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp. 152-156.
23.Williamson, J. (1965): Regional inequality and process of national development: a description of the patterns, Economic development and cultural change, vol. 13, no. 4, part II, pp. 1-84, University of Chicago press.

Downloads

Published

2015-06-30

How to Cite

Wasilewski, A. (2015). EFFICIENCY OF EU FINANCIAL SUPPORT POLICY FOR DEVELOPMENT OF RURAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN POLAND. Economics of Agriculture, 62(2), 437–452. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1502437W

Issue

Section

Original scientific papers