ANALYSIS OF SECURITY MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES AND ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF CORRUPTION IN PRIVATIZATION OF AGRICULTURAL LAND IN SERBIA

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj2103595D

Keywords:

security management, privatization, corruption, economic consequences of corruption, privatization of agricultural land

Abstract

Security management does not make strategic decisions, but it significantly influences their decision-making by providing top management with information and assessments on the basis of which strategic goals are defined and operational decisions are made. The paper also discusses the economic consequences of corruption in the privatization of agricultural land. The subject of the paper is privatization - a litmus test that clearly shows the strength of the Governments commitment to implement comprehensive reforms, primarily due to the consequences it causes in terms of social status and, more importantly, cultural patterns and way of thinking of the population. With privatization, the new owners would very often launder the money gained from criminal activities or would be interested only in acquiring attractive real estate, but not in preserving the production program, which led to a large number of fired workers and destroyed companies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. According to: Economic sanctions, Health and Welfare in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia 1900 - 2000 [in Serbian: Prema: Economic sanctions, Health, and Welfare in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia 1990-2000].
2. Anti – Corruption Council Report 2011, page 16-26. [in Serbian: Izveštaj Saveta za borbu protiv korupcije za 2011. godinu, str. 16-26].
3. Avramovic, N., & Stankovic, M. (2020). Privatization of agriculture according to foreigners. Economics of Agriculture, 67(3), 1029-1039. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj2003029A
4. Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Serbia, Offcial Gazette RS, 72/2011, 101/11, 121/12, 32/13, 45/13, 55/14, 35/19 Belgrade, Serbia. [in Serbian: Zakonik o krivičnom postupku Republike Srbije, "Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije" broj 72/2011, 101/11, 121/12,32/13, 45/13, 55/14, 35/19].
5. Daily "Dnevnik" from April 21, 2013. [in Serbian: Dnevni list "Dnevnik" od 21. aprila 2013. godine].
6. Djukic, S. (2015). Causes, manifestations and economic consequences of corruption in Serbia" – a comparative analysis in developed countries and countries in transition, EDUCONS University, Faculty of Business Economics.
7. Djukic, S. (2016). Analysis of criminal acts of economic crime and crimes of corruption in the economy. Vojno delo, 67(5).
8. Djukic, S. (2016). Corruption in Serbia – theoretical and empirical analysis, University Business Academy in Novi Sad, Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary in Novi Sad.
9. Dragisic, Z., (2014). Security Management, Belgrade, Faculty of Security. [in Serbian: Dragišić Z., (2014) Bezbednosni menadžment, Beograd, Fakultet bezbednosti].
10. Gulan B. (2010). Who cultivates Serbian land, Belgrade.
11. Gulan, B. (2012). Hasty privatization, Belgrade.
12. Mijalkovski, M. (2012). Terrorism and organized crime, Pirot, Pi-press.
13. Mijatovic, B. (2007). Review of the book Begovic Boris: Economic Analysis of Corruption, Center for Liberal – Democratic Studies, Belgrade, Retrieved from www.clds.org.yu/newsite/prikaz-knjige-Bole.pdf.
14. Movement for Freedom, a workers and peasants organization fighting against land grabbing in Serbia (Text written for the publication on land grabbing by the Transnational Institute (TNI) January 2013. [in Serbian: Pokret za slobodu, radničko-seljačka organizacija koja se bori protiv otimanja zemlje u Srbiji (Tekst je pisan za publikaciju o otimanju zemlje Transnacionalnog instituta (TNI), januar 2013. godine].
15. Peter, E. (1999), "New Rules of the Game", Neewsweek (member of the international non-governmental organization "Transparency International"). [in Serbian: Peter, E. (1999), "New Rules of the Game", Neewsweek (član međunarodne nevladine organizacije "Transparency International"].
16. Popov, Đ. (2013). The Impact of Transition on the State of the Serbian Economy. Proceedings of the Faculty of Law in Novi Sad, 47(1), 28-37.
17. Report of the Privatization Agency for 2011. According to: www.priv.rs – Official site of the Privatization Agency. [in Serbian: Izveštaj Agencije za privatizaciju za 2011. godinu. Prema: www.priv.rs — Zvanični sajt Agencije za privatizaciju].
18. Report on state and cooperative land in the privatization process, which was made at the end of 2012 by the Council for the Fight against the Corruption of the Government of the Republic of Serbia (For more details see the Report). [in Serbian: Izveštaj o državnom i zadružnom zemljištu u postupku privatizacije, koji je krajem 2012. godine sačinio Savet za borbu protiv korupcije Vlade Republike Srbije. (Detaljnije podatke videti u Izveštaju)].
19. Stajic, Lj. (2011). Fundamentals of Security Systems, Novi Sad, Faculty of Law in Novi Sad.
20. Stevanovic, O. (2012). Security Management, Belgrade, Criminal Police Academy. [in Serbian: Stevanović, O. (2012), Bezbednosni menadžment, Beograd, Kriminalističko-policijska akademija].
21. Veselinovic J., Djukic S., (2014) Analysis of legal and economical aspects precipitation weather derivates for serbian agricultural sector, Institute of Agricultural Economics, No.4, Belgrade. [in Serbian: Veselinović J., Đukić S., (2014) Analysis of legal and economic aspects of precipitation weather derivatives for Serbian agricultural sector, Časopis Ekonomika poljoprivrede, broj 4, Beograd].

Downloads

Published

2021-09-24

How to Cite

Đukić, S., & Avramović, N. (2021). ANALYSIS OF SECURITY MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES AND ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF CORRUPTION IN PRIVATIZATION OF AGRICULTURAL LAND IN SERBIA. Economics of Agriculture, 68(3), 595–609. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj2103595D

Issue

Section

Original scientific papers

Most read articles by the same author(s)