EVALUATION OF CRITERIA FOR THE DIGITALIZATION OF AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59267/ekoPolj2602453N

Keywords:

Digitalization, Agricultural Machinery, Multi-Criteria Decision Making, SiWeC method

Abstract

In the paper, using the multi-criteria decision-makingmethod SiWeC, the digitization criteria were evaluated onthe example of medium- and heavy-duty tractors. A fuzzyvariant of the multi-criteria decision-making method wasused in order to obtain as precise assessment of the giventen qualitative criteria as possible. The results show that,according to the expert evaluation, the technical criterion“Precision of operations” gained the most importance,while immediately after them in importance were thecriteria related to the level of work automation and digitalconnectivity. The results show important implications fordecision makers, technology producers and the shaping ofagricultural policy. In the future, the model needs to beexpanded with impact criteria, and the number of decisionmakers who would give a practical contribution, as wellas a base for further development of the applied researchmethod, should be increased.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albahri, A., Alamoodi, A., Albahri, O., Zaidan, A., & Zaidan, B. (2025). Integrating Sensors and Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM) in Precision Agriculture: A Mini Review. IEEE Sensors Reviews, 2, 444–450. https://doi.org/10.1109/SR.2025.3596890

Božanić, D., Pamučar, D., Milić, A., Marinković, D., & Komazec, N. (2022). Modification of the logarithm methodology of additive weights (LMAW) by a triangular fuzzy number and its application in multi-criteria decision making. Axioms, 11(3), 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11030089

Büyüközkan, G., & Göçer, F. (2024). Fuzzy TOPSIS-based evaluation of smart sensors for precision agriculture in Turkey. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 46(3), 5875–5890. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-234567

Chauhan, A., Singh, R., & Kumar, P. (2023). Integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach for combine harvester selection in wheat harvesting. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 16(4), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20231604.7890

El-Sayed, M., Abdelkader, E., & El-Sharkawy, M. (2024). Machine learning and analytic hierarchy process integration for selecting a sustainable tractor. Scientific Reports, 14, 26735. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-78023-z

Erdoğan, M. (2022). Assessing farmers’ perception to Agriculture 4.0 technologies: a new interval-valued spherical fuzzy sets based approach. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 37(2), 1751–1801.

Janković, G., & Golubović, M. (2025). Circular economy as the basis of today’s sustainable development. Održivi razvoj, 7(1), 31-62. https://doi.org/10.5937/OdrRaz2501031J

Katranci, A., Kundakci, N., & Kevser, A. (2025). Fuzzy SIWEC and Fuzzy RAWEC Methods for Sustainable Waste Disposal Technology Selection, Spectrum of Operational Research, pp. 87-102, https://doi.org/10.31181/sor31202633

Kenarsari, H. Q., Banaeian, N., & Khani, M. (2024). Selecting a sustainable array of machinery by integrating analytic hierarchy process with gray relational analysis. Operations Research and Decisions, 34(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.37190/ord240207

Kiktev, N., Vasylenko, O., Horetska, I., Panchenko, A., Slobodian, S., Kuboń, M., Skibko, Z., & Hutsol, T. (2025). Smart Solutions in Agricultural Robotics. Agricultural Engineering, 29(1), 157-186. DOI: 10.2478/agriceng-2025-0010. https://reference-global.com/article/10.2478/agriceng-2025-0010

Kizielewicz, B., Wątróbski, J., & Sałabun, W. (2025). Multi-criteria decision support system for the evaluation of UAV intelligent agricultural sensors. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58, 194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11201-1

Kumar, A., Singh, S., & Sharma, V. (2023). Integrated fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy WASPAS approach for sensor selection in precision agriculture. Smart Agricultural Technology, 5, 100267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2023.100267

Liu, J., Zhang, X., & Wang, L. (2024). Fuzzy VIKOR-based selection of integrated sensor irrigation systems in China. Agricultural Water Management, 295, 108765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108765

Luković, M.; Pantović, D.; Dudić, B. (2026). Green human resources management in agri-environmental sector: case from Serbia, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 13(3): 204-215. https://doi.org/10.9770/t6773328652

Nanje, M., Gitau, A., & Mbuge, D. (2024). Multi-Criteria Approach to Determine the Suitability of Potato Harvesters: Case Study Application of Motorcycle Drawn in Nyandarua County, Kenya. Research Square Platform LLC. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4523789/v1

Nedeljković, M., Puška, A., Đokić, M., & Potrebić, V. (2021). Selection of apple harvesting machine by the use of fuzzy method of multi-criteria analysis, International Scientific Conference „Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development-Thematic Proceeding“ Institute of Agricultural Economics, pp. 227-242. https://iep.bg.ac.rs/images/stories/izdanja/Tematski%20Zbornici/Tematski%20zbornik%202021.pdf

Padhiary, M., Kumar, R., & Narayan, L. S. (2024). Navigating the Future of Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review of Automatic All-Terrain Vehicles in Precision Farming, Journal of The Institution of Engineers, № 3, p. 767-782, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, DOI: 10.1007/s40030-024-00816-2 https://ouci.dntb.gov.ua/en/works/4arDAdNl/

Pantović, D., Milutinović, A., Jere Jakulin, T. (2026), Tourists’ perception of the importance of gastronomy and sustainable tourism practices: lessons from Serbia, Economics of sustainable development, 10 (1), 53-46.

Peci, A., Puška, A., Marinković, D., & Nedeljković, M. (2025). Evaluation of tractors based on sustainability criteria using multi-criteria decision-making methods. Engineering Review, 45(1), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.30765/er.2369

Puška, A., Nedeljković, M., Pamučar, D., Božanić, D., & Simić, V. (2024a). Application of the new simple weight calculation (SIWEC) method in the case study in the sales channels of agricultural products, MethodsX, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2024.102930

Puška, A., Božanić, D., Štilić, A., Nedeljković, M., & Khalilzadeh, M. (2025). Application of fuzzy-rough methodology to the selection of electric tractors for small farms in Semberija. Journal of fuzzy extension and applications, 6(4), 651- 668. https://doi.org/10.22105/jfea.2025.482890.1663

Puška, A., Štilić, A., Nedeljković, M., Božanić, D., Milić, A., & Tešić, D. (2024). Application of Fuzzy-Rough Approach in Tractor Selection, Journal of Computational and Cognitive Engineering, Vol. 3(4), pp.434–446, DOI: 10.47852/bonviewJCCE42022314

Sarkar, M. A. R., Hossain, M. S., & Islam, M. S. (2024). Fuzzy AHP-based evaluation and selection of tractors for small-scale farms in Bangladesh. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 26(1), 45–58. https://cigrjournal.org/index.php/Ejounal/article/view/8234

Vujanić, I., Sakač, D., & Arsić, I. (2026). Mogućnost primene lean menadžmenta u savremenim preduzećima. Finansijski Savetnik, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.59864/FinAdv310101IV

Wang, Y., Li, H., & Feng, X. (2025). Research Progress on Agricultural Equipments for Precision Planting and Harvesting. Agriculture, 15(14), 1513. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture15141513. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/14/1513

Wolfert, S., Ge, L., Verdouw, C., & Bogaardt, M.J. (2017). Big data in smart farming – A review. Agricultural Systems, 153, 69–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.023

Zhang, Q. (2023). Encyclopedia of Digital Agricultural Technologies. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-24861-0. https://find.library.upenn.edu/catalog/9979316577703681?hld_id=53806731120003681

Downloads

Published

2026-06-10

How to Cite

Nedeljković, M., Budimir, M. ., & Branković, B. . (2026). EVALUATION OF CRITERIA FOR THE DIGITALIZATION OF AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY. Economic of Agriculture, 73(2), 453–464. https://doi.org/10.59267/ekoPolj2602453N

Issue

Section

Original scientific papers

Most read articles by the same author(s)