MEASURING THE COMMUNICATION EFFECTS OF SALES PROMOTION IN A FOOD COMPANY

Authors

  • Ines Mesaroš, M.A. Faculty of Economics, Subotica
  • Nenad ?oki?, M.A. Higher School of Professional Business Studies, Novi Sad
  • Mirjana Peni?, M.Sc. Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, Faculty of Science, University of Novi Sad

Keywords:

sales promotion, metric conjoint analysis, food company.

Abstract

Consumer targeted sales promotion activities, especially discounts and complimentary products, are frequently pursued in food industry. Their fundamental goal is to boost sales over a given period, with short-term effects. However, studying literature dealing with effects of sales promotion, one will find controversies not only concerning expected economic effects of sales promotion, but also regarding unexpected economic impact of sales promotion on brand image, which is the communication goal of promotion itself. If some of the brand damage effects suggested in one part of literature were accepted as possible, this would result in adverse effect of sales promotion in comparison to other marketing communication tools. All of the above warns of the need to very carefully plan sales promotion activities undertaken by a food company, which requires the possibility of measuring communication effects of sales promotion. This article presents a method of measuring communication effects of sales promotion using the metric conjoint analysis technique on the example of a dairy product.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. De Pelsmacker, P., Geuens, M., Van den Bergh, J. (2007): Marketing Communications-A European Perspective, 3rd ed. Prentice Hall, New York.
2. Đokić, N., Kočić Vugdelija, V., Berber, N. (2011): Uticaj razvoja tržišta na promociju organskih poljoprivrenih proizvoda, Ekonomika poljoprivrede, IEP Beograd, vol. 58, no. 3.
3. Green, P., Krieger, A., Wind, J. (2004): Thirty Years of Conjoint Analysis: Reflection and Prospects. In: Wind, Y. & Green, P. (eds.): Marketing Research and Modelling: Progress and Prospects, Springer Verlag, Berlin.
4. Gustafsson, A., Herrmann, A., Huber, F. (eds.) (2007): Conjoint Measurement: Methods and Applications, Springer Verlag, Berlin.
5. Kotler, Ph., Keller, K-L. (2006): Marketing menadžment, Data Status, Beograd. 6. Kuzmanović, M. (2008): The nonstandard algorithm for constructing efficient conjoint experimental designs, Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research, no. 18 (1).
7. Kuzmanović, М. (2004): Razvoj poslovnih rešenja pomoću conjoint analize, SymOrg, Belgrade.
8. Salai, S., Grubor, A. (2011): Marketing komunikacije, Ekonomski fakultet Subotica, Subotica.
9. Salai, S., Kovač-Žnideršić, R. (2008): Marketing, Alfa Graf, Novi Sad.
10.Vlahović, B., Radojević, V., Živanić, I. (2011): Istraživanje stavova potrošača o potrošnji organske hrane u Srbiji, Ekonomika poljoprivrede, IEP Beograd, vol. 58, no. 3.
11. www.ef.uns.ac.rs/Download/predvidjanje_i_prognostika , accessed April 30, 2011.

Downloads

Published

2013-01-31

How to Cite

Mesaroš, I., Đokić, N., & Penić, M. (2013). MEASURING THE COMMUNICATION EFFECTS OF SALES PROMOTION IN A FOOD COMPANY. Economics of Agriculture, 60(1), 49–64. Retrieved from https://www.ea.bg.ac.rs/index.php/EA/article/view/508

Issue

Section

Original scientific papers